Pleb or snob?

An altercation between a politician and some policemen featured heavily in the UK press this week and prompted thousands of extra hits on the Oxford Dictionaries definition of ‘pleb’:

Plebeian first appeared in English in 1533 with reference to Roman history, meaning ‘a Roman commoner’, or ‘a member of the plebs’. The plebs were the mass of ordinary people in the Roman Republic as distinct from the loftier nobles (or patricians) who ruled as senators and consuls and claimed descent from the original citizen families of Ancient Rome.

The word was already pejorative in the original Latin – apparently nobody wants to be a mere commoner – and the more negative sense of ‘a person not of noble or privileged rank’ was born almost simultaneously in English. It’s now mainly derogatory, used for ‘a person of low social status, a common or vulgar person’.

The first shortened use, pleb, appeared in 1795, in a play by the Irish writer, John O’Keeffe:

1795 J. O’Keefe Life’s Vagaries v. ii. 85 You’re under my roof, you pleb.

This short plosive monosyllable has been popular ever since, in both the neutral sense (‘a member of the ordinary people or working classes’) and the loaded (‘an unsophisticated or uncultured person’).

If anything, plebeian and pleb seem to have gained in derogatory force over the years, so that now we are most likely to take them as slights. Certainly, the colloquial shortening to pleb adds a curtness which sounds peculiarly offensive to our modern ears. Perhaps with less rigid class divisions and social boundaries than before, we are even more sensitive to being consigned to the lowliest of them – especially so in class-conscious Britain. And yet pleb, like its near-equivalent, plebe, is also a colloquial status putdown in the U.S., used within the strict hierarchies of military academies to denote a low-ranking newbie, ‘a new cadet at a military or naval academy’.

Of course, if someone calls you a pleb, you might retort by calling them a snob, but did you know that the earliest recorded meaning of snob is ‘a shoemaker or cobbler; a cobbler’s apprentice’? By 1838 the term snob had developed to be synonymous with pleb, being defined as “A person who has little or no breeding or good taste; a vulgar or ostentatious person”.

Just ten years later in 1848 the Oxford English Dictionary records its first usage of snob (by William Thackeray) to mean ‘A person who admires and seeks to imitate, or associate with, those of higher social status or greater wealth; one who wishes to be regarded as a person of social importance’. Finally, in 1911, George Bernard Shaw is recorded as using snob in the current sense: “A person who despises those whom he or she considers to be inferior in rank, attainment, or taste”.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Which term do you consider more insulting, ‘snob’ or ‘pleb’?

 

Posted on: September 25 2012 | Categories: Word origins | Tags: , , ,

Author

Denny J. Hilton is Senior Assistant Editor at the Oxford English Dictionary.

The opinions and other information contained in the Oxford Dictionaries Online blog posts do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of OUP.

  • justyn

    the term pleb, from latin plebeus, is a very insulting term, in a certain contest, , because it means of low level, from “zolla”, a part of the agricol ground. On the other hand the term snob qualifies a real ham, a person very poor inside; so the term snob is quite worst.

  • keepyercool

    I’m surprised the term “peasant,” I often find it more useful than “pleb” is it signifies in addition that the subject is uncouth and uncultured. It is therefore the worst of the three.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kiosk.goncalves Kiosk Goncalves

    I feel the site is more and more appealing to “commoners” : I think the way the word “snob” made its way through time is fascinating , no doubt being called “pleb” is much more confortable, given the choice ! At least it comes from plebs and kept closer to its context. But what I cannot fully understand is how “common” is seen as such an economic benefit yet, and at the same time, in daily life, human nature does not fit in it at all and rejects it. So pulling up to commoner is fascinating while it means going up. Becomes disgusting if you don`t aspirate to nothing but what it brings,as soon as you get it . Education to diversify specific interests besides common sense economics must develop within the ascending path, to avoid …that the target once reached turns “snob” into a sort of next step as if a kind of “evolution determinism” : which being a contradition is obviously a bias leading into a social trap , and clearly avoidable. I am fascinated with the wide range of subjects being offered simultaneously : why could we hear such a long silence from cultural grounds remains the mistery , where was everyone`s outcry during the last decades of obsessive and obsolete presentations ?! It sounds like a ” focus on excellence, forget about elitism” and making room for great expertise . This is an essencial path of common ground to avoid the dangerous times we just left behind. Meaning that …Education survived , is alive and well ,and people enjoy sharing the path of economic wellbeing along with educational development, simply because of … the human characteristics : the kind of stuff that brought us (commoners, plebs and snobs) from the caves to this site. Wish you all the best !